Science & Technology

A Low-Glycemic Diet is More Effective at Burning Calories

Tomatoes and quite a lot of greens make up the best choice on the low-glycemic purchasing record. Photograph by Jon Chase/Harvard Employees Photographer

A new examine from Boston Kids’s Hospital discovered that each one energy usually are not created equal, suggesting {that a} low-glycemic load weight loss program is more practical than typical approaches at burning energy (and maintaining vitality expenditure) at the next charge after weight reduction.

Printed Tuesday within the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), the examine challenges the notion that “a calorie is a calorie.”

The examine, led by Harvard Medical Faculty (HMS) Assistant Professor of Pediatrics Cara Ebbeling and Professor of Pediatrics David Ludwig, finds diets that cut back the surge in blood sugar after a meal — both low-glycemic index or very-low carbohydrate — could also be preferable to a low-fat weight loss program for these making an attempt to realize lasting weight reduction. Moreover, the examine finds that the low-glycemic index weight loss program had related metabolic advantages to the very low-carb weight loss program with out unfavorable results of stress and irritation as seen by contributors consuming the very low-carb weight loss program.

The analysis was carried out at the New Steadiness Basis Weight problems Prevention Heart at Harvard-affiliated Boston Kids’s Hospital, the place Ludwig is director and Ebbeling is affiliate director.

Weight re-gain is typically attributed to a decline in motivation or adherence to weight loss program and train, however biology additionally performs an necessary function. After weight reduction, the speed at which individuals burn energy (referred to as vitality expenditure) decreases, reflecting slower metabolism. Decrease vitality expenditure provides to the issue of weight upkeep and helps clarify why folks are inclined to re-gain misplaced weight.

The examine suggests {that a} low-glycemic load weight loss program is more practical than typical approaches at burning energy (and maintaining vitality expenditure) at the next charge after weight reduction. Graphic courtesy of Boston Kids’s Hospital

Prior analysis by Ebbeling and Ludwig has proven the benefits of a low-glycemic load weight loss program for weight reduction and diabetes prevention, however the results of those diets throughout weight reduction upkeep has not been properly studied. Analysis reveals that just one in six obese folks will preserve even 10 p.c of their weight reduction over the long run.

The examine suggests {that a} low-glycemic load weight loss program is more practical than typical approaches at burning energy (and maintaining vitality expenditure) at the next charge after weight reduction. “We’ve discovered that, opposite to dietary dogma, all energy usually are not created equal,” says Ludwig, who is additionally director of the Optimum Weight for Life Clinic at Boston Kids’s Hospital. “Complete energy burned plummeted by 300 energy on the low-fat weight loss program in comparison with the low-carbohydrate weight loss program, which might equal the variety of energy usually burned in an hour of moderate-intensity bodily exercise,” he says.

Every of the examine’s 21 grownup contributors (ages 18-40) first needed to lose 10 to fifteen p.c of their physique weight, and after weight stabilization, accomplished all three of the next diets in random order, every for 4 weeks at a time. The randomized crossover design allowed for rigorous commentary of how every weight loss program affected all contributors, whatever the order through which they have been consumed:

The examine used state-of-the-art strategies, comparable to secure isotopes to measure contributors’ complete vitality expenditure, as they adopted every weight loss program.

Every of the three diets fell throughout the regular wholesome vary of 10 to 35 p.c of each day energy from protein. The very-low-carbohydrate weight loss program produced the best enhancements in metabolism, however with an necessary caveat: This weight loss program elevated contributors’ cortisol ranges, which may result in insulin resistance and heart problems. The very-low-carbohydrate weight loss program additionally raised C-reactive protein ranges, which can additionally enhance danger of heart problems.

Although a low-fat weight loss program is historically advisable by the U.S. authorities and American Coronary heart Affiliation, it brought on the best lower in vitality expenditure, an unhealthy lipid sample, and insulin resistance.

“Along with the advantages famous on this examine, we imagine that low-glycemic-index diets are simpler to stay to on a day-to-day foundation, in comparison with low-carb and low-fat diets, which many individuals discover limiting,” says Ebbeling. “In contrast to low-fat and very-low-carbohydrate diets, a low-glycemic-index weight loss program doesn’t get rid of complete lessons of meals, possible making it simpler to comply with and extra sustainable.”

Different co-authors of the examine embody Henry Feldman and Erica Garcia-Lago from Boston Kids’s Hospital, Janis Swain from Brigham and Girls’s Hospital, William Wong from Baylor School of Drugs, and David Hachey from Vanderbilt College. The examine was funded by the Nationwide Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Ailments, the Nationwide Heart for Analysis Sources, the Nationwide Institutes of Well being, and the New Steadiness Basis.

Photos: Jon Chase/Harvard Employees Photographer; Boston Kids’s Hospital

Back to top button