Science & Technology

Commercial branding on spacecraft? Five key points in NASA’s evolving space vision

Why can’t commercials be filmed on the Worldwide Space Station? How about astronaut endorsements of vitality drinks or tennis sneakers? And as a substitute of claiming “The Eagle has landed,” why not receives a commission for saying “Right here’s your orbital Pizza Hut supply”?

The ultimate frontier is edging farther into the industrial frontier: That’s one of many high takeaways from this week’s conferences of the NASA Advisory Council at Ames Analysis Heart in California’s Silicon Valley.

NASA Administrator Jim Bridenstine and different officers and advisers supplied a preview of the developments we’re prone to be seeing in the months and years to return. Right here’s a fast rundown on 5 locations NASA goes towards:

Bridenstine stated a brand new advisory committee, headed by Maxar Applied sciences government Mike Gold, would look into the prospects for parlaying industrial alternatives.

“Is it attainable for NASA to offset among the prices by promoting the naming rights to a spacecraft, or the naming rights to its rockets?” Bridenstine requested.

Gold stated the probabilities may embrace having NASA obtain reimbursement when industrial space firms promote spots on spacecraft heading for the Worldwide Space Station, and leveraging these funds for entry or providers on future private-sector space stations.

“Our firms mustn’t have to show to Russian cosmonauts to execute industrial operations,” Gold stated. “When new industrial substance are created, industrial experiments performed, and even ads filmed, American astronauts ought to cleared the path.”

Up to now, Russia’s space effort led the best way in industrial actions, starting from bringing fare-paying spaceflight individuals on board the space station to filming Pepsi and Pizza Hut commercials. In a famous case from 2000, a Russian Proton rocket was emblazoned with the Pizza Hut emblem for $1 million.

Former NASA official Lori Garver tweeted that U.S. companies have long sought similar exposure by NASA.

“We thought-about this in the ‘90s,” she stated. “Nike would have paid a whole lot of hundreds of thousands for swoosh on the shuttle tank. It was too controversial. Perhaps it’s going to work this time!”

Bridenstine and different NASA officers made clear that they had been all in on the Gateway, an outpost that’s as a result of be constructed in lunar orbit in the course of the 2020s. The Gateway would host crews of astronauts however may additionally maintain itself in between 30- to 90-day-long missions.

Its go-to orbit is called a near-rectilinear halo orbit, which might come closest to one of many lunar poles (most probably the south pole) each six days to facilitate the potential switch of provides and crew to the moon’s floor.

However Bridenstine stated the Gateway’s photo voltaic electrical propulsion system may push it into all kinds of orbits, relying on the mission, and even to the Earth-moon L1 and L2 gravitational stability points, tens of hundreds of miles from the moon.

Bridenstine scoffed on the thought of merely leaving “flags and footprints” on the lunar floor, as was the case with the Apollo moon program of the Sixties and early ’70s.

“This time, once we go, we’re going to go to remain,” he stated, echoing one of Amazon billionaire Jeff Bezos’ space mantras. “We’re going to go sustainably.”

The most important issue behind making the longer term moon marketing campaign sustainable and inexpensive shall be ensuring the spacecraft are reusable. That applies not solely to reusable rockets, corresponding to SpaceX’s Falcon 9 and Blue Origin’s yet-to-be-built New Glenn, but additionally to “reusable tugs to go from Earth orbit to lunar orbit,” plus lunar landers that may be refueled and reflown, Bridenstine stated.

NASA’s heavy-lift moon rocket, the Space Launch System, isn’t at the moment designed to be reusable. However at one level Bridenstine appeared to recommend that future incarnations may incorporate extra reusable parts.

Bridenstine stated one other distinction from Apollo could be elevated reliance on lunar assets. “That’s one other change in our coverage as a rustic,” he stated.

Latest scientific findings have given a lift to hopes that deposits of lunar ice may very well be transformed into breathable air, drinkable water and rocket propellants for refueling depots. However Bridenstine voiced much more formidable hopes, focusing on the potential extraction of platinum group metals or uncommon earth metals from lunar soil.

The administrator acknowledged that it’s not but clear how a lot of such supplies shall be discovered on the moon. “However to the extent that they exist, we must be actively working to ensure that we discover them relatively than any person else,” Bridenstine stated.

Commercialization of lunar assets may ultimately spark a tussle with different nations. U.S. legislation already offers extra weight to non-public claims on space assets, and Gold stated his committee could be taking a look at methods to interpret the Outer Space Treaty in order to not hinder acceptable industrial exercise.

The best way Bridenstine sees it, the Gateway in lunar orbit would function a mannequin for even farther-out space gateways. “We wish to have the ability to replicate that at Mars,” he stated.

However the key problem goes again to the well-known phrase attributed to Mercury astronaut Gus Grissom: “No bucks, no Buck Rogers.”

1 / 4-century in the past, President George H.W. Bush’s Space Exploration Initiative fell wanting its moon-and-Mars purpose, in massive half as a result of a scarcity of cash and political will. Practically a decade in the past, President George W. Bush’s back-to-the-moon Constellation program suffered the same destiny.

Will the present marketing campaign go farther? Keith Cowing, editor of the impartial web site NASA Watch, is cautious:

That is the one PowerPoint chart relating to main challenges that face @NASA Moon and Mars plans that Invoice Gerstenmaier won’t ever present at a public assembly. #NASA

— NASA Watch (@NASAWatch) August 27, 2018

However retired Air Power Gen. Lester Lyles, chairman of the NASA Advisory Council, voiced hope that the sturdy commitments from the White Home, the Nationwide Space Council and Bridenstine will result in a full follow-through this time round.

“No pun supposed, I feel the celebrities are aligned proper now,” Lyles stated.

Back to top button