Science & Technology

Creating Time Crystals Using New Quantum Computing Architectures

An artist’s impression of a discrete time crystal composed of 9 qubits represented by the nuclear spins of 9 carbon-13 atoms in diamond. The chain of related spins is locked in a section the place they periodically invert their states. Credit score: Joe Randall and Tim Taminiau, courtesy of QuTech

UC Berkeley physicist Norman Yao first described 5 years in the past how to make a time crystal — a brand new type of matter whose patterns repeat in time as a substitute of house. In contrast to crystals of emerald or ruby, nevertheless, these time crystals existed for under a fraction of a second.

However the time has arrived for time crystals. Since Yao’s authentic proposal, new insights have led to the invention that point crystals are available in many alternative types, every stabilized by its personal distinct mechanism.

Using new quantum computing architectures, a number of labs have come near making a many-body localized model of a time crystal, which makes use of dysfunction to maintain periodically-driven quantum qubits in a continuing state of subharmonic jiggling — the qubits oscillate, however solely each different interval of the drive.

In a paper revealed within the journal Science final week, Yao and colleagues at QuTech — a collaboration between Delft College of Know-how and TNO, an impartial analysis group within the Netherlands — reported the creation of a many-body localized discrete time crystal that lasted for about eight seconds, equivalent to 800 oscillation intervals. They used a quantum pc primarily based upon a diamond, the place the qubits — quantum bits, the analog of binary bits in digital computer systems — are the nuclear spins of carbon-13 atoms embedded contained in the diamond.

“Whereas a wonderfully remoted time crystal can, in precept, stay endlessly, any actual experimental implementation will decay resulting from interactions with the atmosphere,” mentioned QuTech’s Joe Randall. “Additional extending the lifetime is the subsequent frontier.”

The outcomes, first posted this summer on arXiv, have been replicated in a near-simultaneous experiment by researchers from Google, Stanford and Princeton, utilizing Google’s superconducting quantum pc, Sycamore. That demonstration employed 20 qubits made from superconducting aluminum strips and lasted for about eight-tenths of a second. Each Google’s and QuTech’s time crystals are known as Floquet phases of matter, that are a kind of non-equilibrium materials.

“This can be very thrilling that a number of experimental breakthroughs are occurring concurrently,” says Tim Taminiau, lead investigator at QuTech. “All these totally different platforms complement one another. The Google experiment makes use of two instances extra qubits; our time crystal lives about 10 instances longer.”

Qutech’s group manipulated the 9 carbon-13 qubits in simply the suitable method to fulfill the factors to kind a many-body localized time crystal.

“A time crystal is probably the only instance of a non-equilibrium section of matter,” mentioned Yao, UC Berkeley affiliate professor of physics. “The QuTech system is completely poised to discover different out-of-equilibrium phenomena together with, for instance, Floquet topological phases.”

These outcomes observe on the heels of one other time crystal sighting, additionally involving Yao’s group, revealed in Science a number of months in the past. There, researchers noticed a so-called prethermal time crystal, the place the subharmonic oscillations are stabilized through high-frequency driving. The experiments have been carried out in Monroe’s lab on the College of Maryland utilizing a one-dimensional chain of trapped atomic ions, the identical system that noticed the primary signatures of time crystalline dynamics over 5 years in the past. Apparently, in contrast to the many-body localized time crystal, which represents an innately quantum Floquet section, prethermal time crystals can exist as both quantum or classical phases of matter.

Many open questions stay. Are there sensible purposes for time crystals? Can dissipation assist to increase a time crystal’s lifetimes? And, extra usually, how and when do pushed quantum techniques equilibrate? The reported outcomes exhibit that spin defects in solids are a versatile platform for experimentally finding out these vital open questions in statistical physics.

“The flexibility to isolate the spins from their atmosphere whereas nonetheless with the ability to management their interactions provides a tremendous alternative to check how info is preserved or misplaced,” mentioned UC Berkeley graduate pupil Francisco Machado. “It is going to be fascinating to see what comes subsequent.”


“Many-body-localized discrete time crystal with a programmable spin-based quantum simulator” by J. Randall, C. E. Bradley, F. V. van der Gronden, A. Galicia, M. H. Abobeih, M. Markham, D. J. Twitchen, F. Machado, N. Y. Yao and T. H. Taminiau, 4 November 2021, Science.
DOI: 10.1126/science.abk0603

“Commentary of Time-Crystalline Eigenstate Order on a Quantum Processor” by Xiao Mi, Matteo Ippoliti, Chris Quintana, Ami Greene, Zijun Chen, Jonathan Gross, Frank Arute, Kunal Arya, Juan Atalaya, Ryan Babbush, Joseph C. Bardin, Joao Basso, Andreas Bengtsson, Alexander Bilmes, Alexandre Bourassa, Leon Brill, Michael Broughton, Bob B. Buckley, David A. Buell, Brian Burkett, Nicholas Bushnell, Benjamin Chiaro, Roberto Collins, William Courtney, Dripto Debroy, Sean Demura, Alan R. Derk, Andrew Dunsworth, Daniel Eppens, Catherine Erickson, Edward Farhi, Austin G. Fowler, Brooks Foxen, Craig Gidney, Marissa Giustina, Matthew P. Harrigan, Sean D. Harrington, Jeremy Hilton, Alan Ho, Sabrina Hong, Trent Huang, Ashley Huff, William J. Huggins, L. B. Ioffe, Sergei V. Isakov, Justin Iveland, Evan Jeffrey, Zhang Jiang, Cody Jones, Dvir Kafri, Tanuj Khattar, Seon Kim, Alexei Kitaev, Paul V. Klimov, Alexander N. Korotkov, Fedor Kostritsa, David Landhuis, Pavel Laptev, Joonho Lee, Kenny Lee, Aditya Locharla, Erik Lucero, Orion Martin, Jarrod R. McClean, Trevor McCourt, Matt McEwen, Kevin C. Miao, Masoud Mohseni, Shirin Montazeri, Wojciech Mruczkiewicz, Ofer Naaman, Matthew Neeley, Charles Neill, Michael Newman, Murphy Yuezhen Niu, Thomas E. O’ Brien, Alex Opremcak, Eric Ostby, Balint Pato, Andre Petukhov, Nicholas C. Rubin, Daniel Sank, Kevin J. Satzinger, Vladimir Shvarts, Yuan Su, Doug Pressure, Marco Szalay, Matthew D. Trevithick, Benjamin Villalonga, Theodore White, Z. Jamie Yao, Ping Yeh, Juhwan Yoo, Adam Zalcman, Hartmut Neven, Sergio Boixo, Vadim Smelyanskiy, Anthony Megrant, Julian Kelly, Yu Chen , S. L. Sondhi, Roderich Moessner, Kostyantyn Kechedzhi, Vedika Khemani and Pedram Roushan, 28 July 2021, Quantum Physics.

“Commentary of a prethermal discrete time crystal” by A. Kyprianidis, F. Machado, W. Morong, P. Becker, Ok. S. Collins, D. V. Else, L. Feng, P. W. Hess, C. Nayak, G. Pagano, N. Y. Yao and C. Monroe, 11 June 2021, Science.
DOI: 10.1126/science.abg8102
Back to top button