Facebook says Instagram is not ‘toxic for teens,’ despite damning WSJ report
Tech News

Facebook says Instagram is not ‘toxic for teens,’ despite damning WSJ report

Facebook has fired again almost two weeks after The Wall Street Journal reported that Instagram made physique picture points worse for one in three teenage ladies in response to Facebook’s personal knowledge. The salvo comes courtesy of Pratiti Raychoudhury, Vice President, Head of Analysis at Facebook. Raychoudhury’s submit on Facebook’s Newsroom claims that The Wall Road Journal’s characterization of inner analysis is “not correct” and blames all of it on a poor interpretation of the information the WSJ has in its possession.

On September 14 The Wall Road Journal printed a narrative to The Facebook Recordsdata, which is a collection of tales primarily based round an unlimited cache of inner Facebook paperwork leaked to the newspaper. The September 14 piece focused on data that advised Instagram had a particularly dangerous impact on youngsters — notably teenage ladies. The WSJ claimed that Facebook was nicely conscious of the hurt its merchandise had on youngsters and that the corporate “has made minimal efforts to handle these points and performs them down in public.”

Facebook has been evasive concerning the contents of the research cited by the WSJ. However Facebook’s world head of security, Antigone Davis, is expected to appear before the Senate Commerce Subcommittee Thursday to reply for the claims made within the story and plans for a new “Instagram for kids”. Raychoudhury particularly cites that listening to as the rationale for the submit.

Raychoudhury ignores lots of the points raised within the WSJ piece, together with that teenagers claimed they felt hooked on Instagram. As a substitute she focuses her energies on devaluing Facebook’s personal analysis. A lot of the WSJ’s most scathing claims, in response to Raychoudhury, deal with a research that had simply 40 partipants. That may be a paltry pattern dimension by any measure — however notably while you’re speaking a few platform with over 1 billion customers. The tiny research was “designed to tell inner conversations about teenagers’ most destructive perceptions of Instagram,” Raychoudhury claims.

Raychoudhury additionally takes umbrage with the WSJ referring to an inner Facebook slide that claims “we make physique pictures worse for 1 in 3 teenage ladies”. Raychoudhury repeatedly notes that the physique picture drawback was simply one among 12 doable points that Instagram may make worse for teenage ladies. “Physique picture was the one space the place teen ladies who reported fighting the problem mentioned Instagram made it worse as in comparison with the opposite 11 areas,” she writes.

Sadly neither Facebook, Instagram, or Raychoudhury have launched the precise knowledge that she repeatedly cites in her response to the Journal’s reporting. With out seeing the information ourselves it’s extraordinarily troublesome to evaluate The Wall Road Journal’s or Raychoudhury’s intepretations of it. However, you realize, this isn’t the first time we’ve heard about these problems.

Related posts

Microsoft doesn’t need to replace Ballmer as much as it needs to replace Gates


Ford may dump Microsoft, turning instead to BlackBerry’s in-car technology


Project Veritas founder wants to sue Twitter for defamation over recent suspension