Judge upholds Seattle artist’s claim for ‘Angry Birds’ rights against pet toy firm

A decide is upholding seven of eight claims in a lawsuit filed final summer time by a Seattle artist suing a pet toy firm over the usage of her ‘Indignant Birds’ toys.

As creator of plush toys for pets she known as ‘Indignant Birds,’ Juli Adams struck a cope with Hartz Mountain Corp., which she contends circled and bought her ‘Indignant Birds’ pet toy line to Rovio Leisure.

The lawsuit states that Hartz by no means bought the mental property from Adams, and the corporate entered right into a separate settlement with Rovio as soon as ‘Indignant Birds’ turned common. The transfer allegedly “disadvantaged her of thousands and thousands of {dollars} of royalties on gross sales of Indignant Birds pet toys,” based on a press launch from Adams’ attorneys at Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro in Seattle.

Apparently, a U.S. District Courtroom decide thinks so, too. In line with an order, he rejected Hartz’s movement to dismiss the case, upholding claims that the corporate “violated its contract with Adams, was unjustly enriched, and wrongfully used her trademark.”

“We imagine that when Hartz dumped Ms. Adams’ toy line and struck a profitable cope with Rovio, it knew precisely what it was doing – deliberately reducing Juli Adams out of the image to revenue on the ‘Indignant Birds’ identify,” mentioned Anthony Shapiro, a companion at Hagens Berman and one of many attorneys representing Adams, in a press launch.

Adams’ final royalty fee from Hartz was for $40.66 in 2011.

The order beneath:

Woman sues toy company over 'Angry Birds' pet toys

Back to top button