The company’s new financial support will not translate into any special influence in the organization’s decision making, noted OSI General Manager Patrick Masson.
“OSI Corporate Sponsors have no role in OSI governance,” he told LinuxInsider. “For example, a sponsor is not provided a board seat or any other role in our operations.”
Founded in 1998, the Open Source Initiative is a global nonprofit organization dedicated to promoting and protecting open source software through education, collaboration and infrastructure. Based in California, OSI is a public benefit corporation with 501(c)(3) tax-exempt status.
Premium sponsorship is simply a higher level of financial commitment to the OSI. The amount of the contributions vary based on the sponsor’s annual revenue, explained Masson.
Companies that contribute at a lower level are recognized as “sponsors.” Organizations that provide in-kind donations such as hosting are recognized as “supporters.”
“Organizations like Microsoft would contribute a greater amount than smaller companies, e.g. USB Direct, to be listed as a ‘premium sponsor,'” Masson said.
In appreciation of their donations, sponsors are recognized on OSI marketing and promotional materials such as websites and brochures. Premium sponsors also may receive a tax deduction if OSI’s nonprofit status is recognized by their jurisdiction of incorporation.
OSI shares information related to its sponsors’ developments or activities that align with its mission to promote and protect open source software and communities.
“To be clear, we would not promote a sponsor’s products or services but would share any activities that highlight the value, adoption, etc., of open source,” said Masson.
Matter of Degrees
Whatever level of sponsorship is involved, the companies backing OSI help to support the spread and success of open source products. Microsoft’s involvement emphasizes just how far the open source software movement has progressed, noted Masson.
In year past, Microsoft and the open source movement engaged in open warfare. Now the company is a paying player in the movement and the No. 1 open source contributor on GitHub.
“I think that any contribution and support to open source software is a good thing. I just hope that their efforts are honest and sincere, and not simply part of a deceptive marketing plot,” said Peter Yang, cofounder of
“While many people are skeptical of their motives, I think that if we reward the changes in Microsoft’s behavior with more distrust, we would not be giving them a fair chance,” he told LinuxInsider.
More to It
Still, it’s unlikely that it will result in the spread of open source to any significant degree.
“Linux and open source have flourished for over two decades despite the resistance and opposition of sizable foes, including Microsoft,” King told LinuxInsider.
“Open source won the revolution — especially in the data center. Thinking that Microsoft’s change of heart will tangibly speed that continuing growth and success is not likely or realistic,” he said.
Microsoft’s Path to Open Source
Perhaps the open source software community really started taking Microsoft more seriously when the company released its .Net framework in 2014 under an open source license.
Since then, Microsoft has increased its participation in the community, releasing products like Visual Studio Code and Typescript to open source.
More recently, Microsoft brought Bash/Linux to Windows 10 and expanded its support for Linux and open source workloads on its Azure cloud platform. The company also joined The Linux Foundation, an OSI Affiliate Member, and has worked on many of its projects.
“This is a significant milestone for the OSI and the open source software movement more broadly,” said OSI’s Masson. “I don’t think there could be any greater testament to the maturity, viability, interest, and success of open source software than not only Microsoft’s recognition, but also their support as a sponsor, as well as their participation as contributors to so many open source projects and communities.”
Microsoft’s growing kinship with open source will benefit the community in many ways, Masson said. Its financial contributions, together with those from other sponsors and members, support day-to-day operations and infrastructure maintenance, allowing the OSI to continue its mission.
“I think it is also fair to say how proud we are of the open source community and our own work,” he added “where advocacy takes the form of quiet persuasion rather than public activism.”