Science & Technology

New Force of Nature? Tantalizing Evidence for New Physics From CERN’s Large Hadron Collider

Particle Accelerator Physics Concept

The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) sparked worldwide pleasure in March as particle physicists reported tantalizing evidence for new physics — probably a brand new pressure of nature. Now, our new result, but to be peer reviewed, from CERN’s gargantuan particle collider appears to be including additional assist to the concept.

Our present greatest concept of particles and forces is named the standard model, which describes all the things we all know concerning the bodily stuff that makes up the world round us with unerring accuracy. The usual mannequin is no doubt probably the most profitable scientific concept ever written down and but on the identical time we all know it should be incomplete.

Famously, it describes solely three of the four fundamental forces – the electromagnetic pressure and powerful and weak forces, leaving out gravity. It has no rationalization for the dark matter that astronomy tells us dominates the universe, and can’t clarify how matter survived in the course of the large bang. Most physicists are subsequently assured that there should be extra cosmic substances but to be found, and learning a range of basic particles generally known as magnificence quarks is a very promising method to get hints of what else is likely to be on the market.

Magnificence quarks, typically referred to as backside quarks, are fundamental particles, which in flip make up larger particles. There are six flavors of quarks which can be dubbed up, down, unusual, appeal, magnificence/backside and fact/prime. Up and down quarks, for instance, make up the protons and neutrons within the atomic nucleus.

The LHCb experiment at CERN. Credit score: CERN

Magnificence quarks are unstable, residing on common simply for about 1.5 trillionths of a second earlier than decaying into different particles. The best way magnificence quarks decay will be strongly influenced by the existence of different basic particles or forces. When a magnificence quark decays, it transforms right into a set of lighter particles, comparable to electrons, via the affect of the weak pressure. One of the methods a brand new pressure of nature would possibly make itself recognized to us is by subtly altering how typically magnificence quarks decay into differing kinds of particles.

The March paper was primarily based on information from the LHCb experiment, one of 4 large particle detectors that report the result of the extremely high-energy collisions produced by the LHC. (The “b” in LHCb stands for “magnificence.”) It discovered that magnificence quarks have been decaying into electrons and their heavier cousins referred to as muons at completely different charges. This was actually shocking as a result of, in keeping with the usual mannequin, the muon is principally a carbon copy of the electron – similar in each approach besides for being round 200 instances heavier. Which means all of the forces ought to pull on electrons and muons with equal energy – when a magnificence quark decays into electrons or muons through the weak pressure, it ought to take action equally typically.

As an alternative, my colleagues discovered that the muon decay was solely occurring about 85% as typically because the electron decay. Assuming the result’s appropriate, the one method to clarify such an impact could be if some new pressure of nature that pulls on electrons and muons otherwise is interfering with how magnificence quarks decay.

The end result induced big pleasure amongst particle physicists. We’ve been looking out for indicators of one thing past the usual mannequin for many years, and regardless of ten years of work on the LHC, nothing conclusive has been discovered to date. So discovering a brand new pressure of nature could be an enormous deal and will lastly open the door to answering some of the deepest mysteries going through trendy science.

Whereas the end result was tantalizing, it wasn’t conclusive. All measurements include a sure diploma of uncertainty or “error.” On this case there was solely round a one in 1,000 likelihood that the end result was right down to a random statistical wobble – or “three sigma” as we are saying in particle physics parlance.

One in 1,000 might not sound like lots, however we make a really massive quantity of measurements in particle physics and so that you would possibly count on a small handful to throw up outliers simply by random likelihood. To be actually certain that the impact is actual, we’d must get to 5 sigma – akin to lower than a one in 1,000,000 likelihood of the impact being right down to a merciless statistical fluke.

To get there, we have to scale back the dimensions of the error, and to do that we want extra information. One method to obtain that is merely to run the experiment for longer and report extra decays. The LHCb experiment is at the moment being upgraded to have the ability to report collisions at a a lot greater fee in future, which is able to permit us to make rather more exact measurements. However we will additionally get helpful data out of the info we’ve already recorded by trying for related sorts of decays which can be more durable to identify.

That is what my colleagues and I’ve performed. Strictly talking, we by no means really research magnificence quark decays immediately, since all quarks are at all times certain along with different quarks to make bigger particles. The March research checked out magnificence quarks that have been paired up with “up” quarks. Our end result studied two decays: one the place the wonder quarks that have been paired with “down” quarks and one other the place they have been additionally paired with up quarks. That the pairing is completely different shouldn’t matter, although – the decay that’s occurring deep down is identical and so we’d count on to see the identical impact, if there actually is a brand new pressure on the market.

And that’s precisely what we’ve seen. This time, muon decays have been solely occurring round 70% as typically because the electron decays however with a bigger error, that means that the result’s about “two sigma” from the usual mannequin (round a two in 100 likelihood of being a statistical anomaly). Which means whereas the end result isn’t exact sufficient by itself to say agency proof for a brand new pressure, it does line up very intently with the earlier end result and provides additional assist to the concept that we is likely to be on the brink of a significant breakthrough.

In fact, we needs to be cautious. There’s some method to go nonetheless earlier than we will declare with a level of certainty that we actually are seeing the affect of a fifth pressure of nature. My colleagues are at the moment working laborious to squeeze as a lot data as attainable out of the present information, whereas busily making ready for the primary run of the upgraded LHCb experiment. In the meantime, different experiments on the LHC, as nicely on the Belle 2 experiment in Japan, are closing in on the identical measurements. It’s thrilling to assume that within the subsequent few months or years a brand new window could possibly be opened on probably the most basic substances of our universe.

Written by Harry Cliff, Particle physicist, College of Cambridge.

This text was first printed in The Conversation.The Conversation
Back to top button