Computer & Internet

Qualcomm May Seek iPhone Ban to Retaliate Against Apple

Qualcomm plans to ask the U.S. Worldwide Commerce Fee to block imports of iPhones, Bloomberg reported Wednesday, citing an individual conversant in the matter.

Qualcomm May Seek iPhone Ban to Retaliate Against Apple

The transfer reportedly was spurred by Apple’s latest determination to cease making royalty funds owed underneath a licensing settlement between the 2 corporations, which is the topic of a billion-dollar
in federal court docket.

Qualcomm final month introduced that for the quarter ended March 31 Apple had withheld funds to its contract producers for royalties owed underneath a licensing deal for know-how used within the iPhone.

Apple knowledgeable Qualcomm that it might proceed withholding these funds till the authorized dispute was resolved in court docket, Qualcomm stated.

“Apple is badly interfering with Qualcomm’s longstanding agreements with Qualcomm licensees,” Dan Rosenberg, normal counsel at Qualcomm, stated final month. “These license agreements stay legitimate and enforceable.”

Qualcomm minimize its fiscal third-quarter revenue to 75-85 US cents a share, from prior estimates of 90 cents to $1.15. The corporate minimize its income forecast to between $4.8 billion and $5.6 billion, from earlier steering of $5.3 billion to $6.1 billion.

“When it comes to why we’re withholding royalties, you possibly can’t pay one thing when there is a dispute concerning the quantity,” Apple CEO Tim Cook dinner stated. “You do not know how a lot to pay.”

Qualcomm has been charging a proportion of the iPhone worth, he stated, and although they “do some nice work round standards-essential patents,” the Qualcomm contribution is only one small a part of an iPhone.

Pre-emptive Strike

Qualcomm will ask the ITC to ban imports of the iPhone, which is made in Asia, in anticipation of a brand new iPhone mannequin scheduled for launch this fall, in accordance to the Bloomberg report.

Qualcomm wouldn’t touch upon its authorized choices relating to the Apple case, spokesperson Clare Conley advised the E-Commerce Occasions, reiterating the truth that it didn’t remark for the Bloomberg report.

Such a transfer doubtless would fall underneath Part 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, which offers for stop and desist orders in mental property disputes, ITC spokesperson Margaret O’Laughlin advised the E-Commerce Occasions. Nonetheless, she didn’t touch upon whether or not such a request had been made or whether or not both of the businesses had contacted the ITC.

If Qualcomm ought to prevail in a case filed with the ITC, the outcome could be what’s referred to as an “exclusion order,” stated Alexander Poltorak, CEO of

“With an exclusion order, Qualcomm can file a customs survey and block Apple telephones from getting into the nation,” he advised the E-Commerce Occasions.

Proceedings like this have to be accomplished inside 12 months by statute, Poltorak stated, although they are often prolonged one other six months in notably advanced circumstances.

Qualcomm Corners Market

Apple initially filed the $1 billion go well with in U.S. District Court docket in Southern California, alleging that Qualcomm was utilizing its dominant place in semiconductors to power billions of {dollars} in royalty funds for applied sciences utilized in Contact ID, Apple Pay and even added reminiscence.

These applied sciences don’t have anything to do with the Qualcomm baseband processor chipsets used within the iPhone, Apple contended.

Qualcomm final month denied the allegations and filed counterclaims alleging that Apple breached agreements and inspired regulatory assaults towards Qualcomm as a part of a scheme to coerce unfair licensing phrases.

Qualcomm final yr was hit with a file $865 million effective by South Korean regulators who decided that the corporate engaged in anticompetitive practices involving its chipsets for cellphones.

The U.S. Federal Commerce Fee earlier this yr filed go well with towards Qualcomm, alleging it primarily monopolized the sale of baseband processors by means of its “no license, no chips” coverage, and that it coerced Apple into an exclusivity deal for a number of years in change for decreased royalties.
Qualcomm May Seek iPhone Ban to Retaliate Against Apple
Back to top button