What you learn after 350 hours of Joe Rogan

16 minutes read

Right here I’m. Again once more in your inbox on a Tuesday, within the remaining weeks earlier than Christmas, New 12 months’s, and, for you enterprise people, the top of the quarter. For at present’s Scorching Pod, I interviewed the Media Issues researcher who listened to over 350 hours of The Joe Rogan Expertise this yr and reported again on what we’re all lacking. He says the present, for these of us who aren’t spending our time there, is presently greatest described as a “cesspool of poisonous masculinity that discusses elk searching, combined martial arts, anti-trans views, and dangerous well being details about the coronavirus pandemic.”

We’ll additionally focus on separate — however, in some circumstances, associated — Spotify conditions and extra “greenwashing” in podcast adverts. Extra, extra, extra, simply in time for the season of giving. Let’s get to it.

EXCLUSIVE: Meet the reporter devoted to cataloging Joe Rogan’s bonkers claims

As you all nicely know, Joe Rogan is the preferred podcaster within the US and, seemingly, the world. He made his identify interviewing main company and for his off-the-cuff, at occasions controversial, takes on the world. Spotify reportedly paid him $100 million to carry his present to the platform solely, which resulted in it distributing a well-liked however contentious program. The platform retains getting flack over what its star podcaster says, largely as a result of it’s spending a lot cash to maintain him there and particularly courted this.

Many of us who know this context may be curious to listen to what Rogan is basically as much as on his podcast, solely to then see his episodes can span hours and publish a number of occasions per week. So enter Alex Paterson, a researcher at Media Issues whose beat as of the previous yr or so has included listening to Rogan and reporting again on every thing he’s listening to. That work culminated in a narrative final week referred to as: Joe Rogan Wrapped: A year of COVID-19 misinformation, right-wing myths, and anti-trans rhetoric.

I caught up with Paterson the day after the story ran and chatted with him to get a greater sense of what he’s seeing. He tells me he listens to the episodes as quickly as they arrive out, on 2X pace, to catch every thing Rogan says. How are all these hours of Rogan listening going? Does Spotify appear to have taken any motion?

This interview has been edited and condensed for readability and size.

Hello, Alex. Thanks for taking the time to talk. My first, apparent query: why are you so fascinated about Joe Rogan particularly?

Alex Paterson, researcher at Media Issues: I began often monitoring Joe Rogan’s podcast starting final yr in 2020 when he had Abigail Shrier on to push anti-trans rhetoric. She’s an anti-trans journalist who used to work at The Wall Road Journal, and through that podcast, they in contrast being trans to becoming a member of a cult or slicing your self via self-harm. After that, realizing that Joe Rogan’s podcast is one of the preferred — if not the hottest — podcasts on this planet, I wished to trace the rhetoric he’s pushing on his present to assist doc how dangerous it’s to our society at giant. Significantly on this new yr, and because the pandemic has begun, Rogan has taken a transparent lurch to the best and turn into a serial misinformer with regards to COVID-19 misinformation, and we’ve been making an attempt to doc and restrict the harms that he’s making an attempt to push into the world.

You stated you’ve been monitoring him since 2020. How have you seen Rogan’s rhetoric change in that point?

I consider he’s turn into extra emboldened to push baseless conspiracy theories and right-wing lies over the previous yr. Since I began reporting on Rogan’s podcast, he’s damaged into mainstream protection pretty typically: first, together with his lie about left-wing folks beginning wildfires in Oregon, after which once more actually prominently, [saying] he would encourage wholesome, younger folks to not get vaccinated. And all through all of that reporting, at the very least from my view, he hasn’t confronted any actual punishment from Spotify. And I feel that’s emboldened him to proceed pushing hate and lies on his podcast. Simply from listening to him day by day, he’s not at all remitting conspiracy theories and false rhetoric on his present. If something, he’s leaning into it extra. He’s celebrated in conservative areas for it. He’s a darling of the conservative proper in the USA.

I do know you and Media Issues extra broadly cowl the broader world of the best, so locations like Fox and OAN. Do you see any parallels between that world and Rogan’s?

Yeah, I fully see it as associated. Rogan is somebody who celebrates himself as being a so-called impartial thinker who has each conservative and progressive values, and I feel that completely illustrates our basic media panorama’s bend in direction of right-wing views and over accommodating ring-wing views and never difficult right-wing misinformation. So I feel he performs a fairly central function in that panorama, and he’s additionally deeply related to the community of conservative media. He hosts Ben Shapiro. He hosts Alex Jones. He’s an enormous supporter of Tucker Carlson, who we all know is Fox Information’ hate-mongerer-in-chief. I feel he performs a central function within the right-wing misinformation system.

A lot of us within the podcast world are fascinated about how Spotify treats Rogan. Have you gotten any sense that it’s taking motion to average his content material?

Rogan has acknowledged quite a few occasions that Spotify has by no means spoken to him concerning the hate that he pushes on his podcast or taken any steps to attempt to curt him from doing so. You’re listening to it from his mouth, after which once we have a look at Spotify’s year-end abstract for his or her Wrapped, he’s the star of their podcasting, which is an empire Spotify may be very clearly making an attempt to develop. On YouTube, which I might say has stronger enforcement round COVID misinformation, although it’s removed from nice, his present would typically be demonetized and infrequently eliminated. I feel he views Spotify as a spot the place he might unfold his particular variety of bigotry and vile with none actual penalties.

Have you seen any particular moments the place you assume YouTube would have moderated his content material, however Spotify doesn’t?

Oh, yeah, completely. We do loads of work at Media Issues round tech accountability and phrases of service, and usually, I might say social media firms are failing to manage right-wing extremism on the web. And Spotify has some of the least, nearly non-existent, phrases of service to guard customers and most people from hatred and focused violence. Joe Rogan has misgendered and denigrated trans youth on his podcast and by no means confronted any penalties. Now we have seen YouTube take some steps to take away content material that’s just like that, and YouTube has a coverage towards selling COVID-19 misinformation. That’s turn into the central core of Rogan’s podcast, and Spotify, together with CEO Daniel Ek, has refused to take any motion towards Joe Rogan.

You don’t depend on transcripts to observe the present, and I’m wanting barely forward, however I do marvel how a lot that speaks to the broader points platforms may need moderating exhibits. Transcripts don’t catch every thing, particularly with speech nuances. So I’m wondering if you or the crew have proposed options to assist platforms remedy these points?

The very first thing that involves thoughts once I assume of Spotify and Joe Rogan and moderation, like how we might average extremism on-line, is that Spotify isn’t even at that desk. That might look like one thing they aren’t even contemplating with Joe Rogan. So to think about a world by which Spotify may monitor his transcript is so removed from actuality that we’re simply asking them to, at a really baseline, cease their most outstanding podcast host from rising vaccine hesitancy and harming our nation’s public response to the pandemic total. Joe Rogan has proven actually clearly that he’ll use his podcast to unfold conspiracy theories, right-wing lies, [and] racist rhetoric to be able to type of promote himself. And sure, Spotify, their CEO, and their comms crew has gone on the document time and time once more saying that he hasn’t violated their phrases. At this level, it’s like, what would it not take?

Nicely, I recognize you doing this work and taking the time. Is there the rest you assume folks ought to learn about Rogan that they may not be contemplating?

One factor we’ve finished at Media Issues is attempt to doc how social media algorithms and far-right on-line communities can radicalize on a regular basis folks pretty simply. I feel Rogan is an efficient instance of that. Let’s say you’re a younger man listening to The Joe Rogan Expertise, and you wish to get recommendations on bodybuilding or the way to eat healthfully, after which Rogan begins discussing that vaccines are a type of gene remedy with Ben Shapiro, after which maybe you go to Ben Shapiro’s web site, The Every day Wire, and there, you fall right into a cesspool of hatred and bigotry, and as soon as you click on on a Every day Wire article, if you share it on Fb, you’re simply going to be led additional and additional down the far-right rabbit gap. That may take somebody from being an on a regular basis individual [to] instantly being fed information and misinformation about QAnon and different right-wing lies. I feel it’s vital to remember that Joe Rogan spreading this misinformation has real-world penalties that may have actually dire results for marginalized folks.

For what it’s value, I reported on Rogan telling younger adults not to get vaccinated and identified that Spotify had particularly eliminated music and podcasts that claimed vaccines not solely kill folks but additionally have microchips in them. (Each of which aren’t true.) On the time, Spotify stated it “prohibits content material on the platform which promotes harmful false, misleading, or deceptive content material about COVID-19 that will trigger offline hurt and/or pose a direct menace to public well being.” I’d encourage you to take a look at Paterson’s story for a greater sense of what Rogan is saying and resolve for your self whether or not it falls inside these bounds.

And if you’re questioning how influential Rogan actually is, take a peek at this story, which discusses “Dr. Joe Rogan’s” affect on varied folks’s COVID therapy plans, specifically UFC president Dana White and his household.

I reached out to Spotify to see if the crew wished to touch upon the above interview. A spokesperson, who requested to stay nameless as a result of of the “sensitivity of the subject material,” despatched the identical remark as above again however with this tacked onto the top: “When content material is flagged for potential violations of our insurance policies, it’s completely reviewed by our in-house crew and out of doors consultants, if obligatory. If that content material is discovered to be in violation of our insurance policies, the suitable enforcement motion is taken.”

In the meantime, in separate Spotify moderation information…

Racist, antisemitic, hateful podcasts stay on Spotify and Google Podcasts

Sky Information published an investigation on Friday into extremist podcasts and located “a number of days’ value” of content material selling “excessive views akin to scientific racism, Holocaust denial and far-right antisemitic conspiracy theories.” Reporter Victoria Elms says specific slurs might be heard, in addition to direct calls to violence towards Jewish folks. She additionally notes that these podcasters are utilizing the episode description field to advertise hateful movies hosted on different platforms, together with one about “Dylann Roof’s insightful manifesto.” Spotify eliminated the content material after Sky Information’ reachout, however they continue to be stay on Google Podcasts. Pertinent to us is Elms’ notice concerning the black field that’s these platforms’ moderation efforts. I wrote about this in February — notably how tough will probably be to catch and take down infringing content material — and proceed to consider how dire this may turn into when each platform consists of an audio part, the characteristic du jour.

I hate to maintain hammering y’all with unhealthy Spotify issues, however we’re going to maintain going. It’s the winter vitality, I assume.

Spotify takes down comedians’ albums over royalty dispute

That is tangential for us however attention-grabbing, because it pertains to spoken phrase content material. Spotify has removed “tons of of comedians’” work from its platform over a brand new royalties combat. Summed up as merely as I can: comedians are compensated as performers via their label or distributor, however they wish to now additionally obtain writing credit, or what international rights administration firm Spoken Giants calls their literary rights. (This parallels the royalties within the music trade — a songwriting credit score pays totally different royalties, which might be extra profitable. I like to recommend listening to or reading my boss’s podcast, Decoder, with Charlie Harding of Switched on Pop for extra on how this works in music land.)

Spoken Giants is main the cost right here, making an attempt to barter for these comics to obtain the writing credit and subsequent royalty payouts, however the comics are within the lurch proper now, unable to have their content material streamed in any respect on one of the world’s largest platforms. The Wall Road Journal notes that Spoken Giants “began by representing writers of comedy bits and jokes, with plans to develop throughout podcasts, speeches and lectures.” The podcast writing credit score royalty system, might it occur?

Now, let’s shut the loop on the ExxonMobil Every day advert, for now at the very least…

Podcast adverts make up oil firms’ “greenwashing” technique

A couple of weeks in the past, I coated the debacle over an ExxonMobil ad that appeared on The Daily. The advert, local weather change reporter Emily Atkin wrote, was deceptive and never wholly indicative of what Exxon is definitely doing.

Yesterday, Drilled podcast host and journalist Amy Westervelt published a bigger piece on the rising development of oil firms’ adverts exhibiting up in podcasts. She writes that podcast publishers must “develop their very own tips and fact-checking processes” across the climate-friendly claims they make as a result of the Federal Commerce Fee largely solely cares about claims round merchandise, which the oil firms don’t promote. The piece culminates within the concluding thought, “What’s in place now for figuring out misinformation in adverts isn’t actually a framework for figuring out greenwashing,” says John Prepare dinner, analysis fellow on the Local weather Change Communication Analysis Hub. So even when the Instances and others implement fact-checking for adverts, which they are saying they already do, squishy language from oil firms might go that take a look at and seemingly already has.

Broadly, all of at present’s tales add as much as an even bigger dialog across the new world that podcasting inhabits. The trade’s receiving extra consideration than ever earlier than from shops like Scorching Pod and The Verge but additionally greater publications who spot unusual and unhealthy issues taking place. The trade’s rising and now faces the identical issues huge social platforms, like Fb and YouTube, deal with often. Prepare dinner, from Westervelt’s story, advises Fb on local weather disinformation, simply so you can get a way of how a lot experience is required on the platforms. The expectations are increased for podcasts, and this rigidity between stepping up and assembly them versus punting till podcasting has extra assets will solely proceed transferring ahead.

I like a lil year-end tease. If you need extra audio and podcasting trade evaluation, you can subscribe for 2 further points here. In any other case, I’ll catch you subsequent week.

Related Posts